@article {1009,
	title = {Weevils and plants - phylogenetic versus ecological mediation of evolution of host plant associations in Curculioninae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae).},
	journal = {Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada},
	volume = {165},
	year = {1993},
	month = {1993///},
	pages = {197 - 232},
	keywords = {ASSOCIATIONS, coleoptera, EVOLUTION, HOST-PLANT, PLANTS},
	author = {Anderson,R.S.}
}
@article {1172,
	title = {Evolution of feeding behavior in insect herbivores - Success seen as different ways to eat without being eaten},
	journal = {Bioscience},
	volume = {48},
	year = {1998},
	note = {Journal
JAN
YM059
BIOSCIENCE},
	month = {1998///},
	pages = {35 - 44},
	keywords = {EVOLUTION, insect, insect herbivores},
	url = {ISI:000071023800008},
	author = {Bernays,E.A.}
}
@article {969,
	title = {Ecological genetics of an induced plant defense against herbivores: Additive genetic variance and costs of phenotypic plasticity},
	journal = {Evolution},
	volume = {56},
	year = {2002},
	note = {Journal
NOV
623BK
EVOLUTION},
	month = {2002///},
	pages = {2206 - 2213},
	keywords = {defense, EVOLUTION},
	url = {ISI:000179683100010},
	author = {Agrawal,A.A. and Conner,J.K. and Johnson,M.T.J. and Wallsgrove,R.}
}
@article {1174,
	title = {Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: Implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation},
	journal = {Annual Review of Entomology},
	volume = {46},
	year = {2001},
	note = {Journal
418EE
ANNU REV ENTOMOL},
	month = {2001///},
	pages = {703 - 727},
	keywords = {EVOLUTION, insect, INSECTS, PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECTS},
	url = {ISI:000167877300024},
	author = {Bernays,E.A.}
}
@article {971,
	title = {Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence},
	journal = {Functional Ecology},
	volume = {25},
	year = {2011},
	note = {J
APR},
	month = {2011///},
	pages = {420 - 432},
	abstract = {P>1. In this essay I summarize current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence, while advocating for approaches that integrate community ecology with specific tests of classic evolutionary hypotheses. Several conclusions emerge. 2. The microevolution of defence is perhaps best studied by reciprocal transplant experiments of differentiated plant populations while simultaneously manipulating the presence of the herbivore(s) hypothesized to be the agent(s) of natural selection. 3. Although there is continued interest in the costs of defence, I argue that some empirical approaches to estimating costs (e.g. genetic engineering) may provide limited insight into evolutionary processes. 4. Essentially all plants employ several different lines of defence against herbivory. It is thus time to abandon searching for single silver bullet traits and the simple trade-off model (where traits are arbitrarily expected to negatively covary across genotypes or species). We still know very little about which trait combinations are most effective and have repeatedly evolved together. Thus, some of our prominent theories (e.g. a predicted trade-off between direct and indirect defence) need to be revised. 5. Studies of the macroevolution of plant defence are enjoying renewed interest due to available phylogenies and analytical methods. Although general trends are not currently surmisable, we will soon have strong case studies evaluating both biotic and abiotic drivers of convergent evolution in defence strategies and the role of defence evolution in the adaptive radiation of plant lineages. 6. The evolution of specificity is proposed as a final frontier in understanding complexity in plant-herbivore interactions. Although it is abundantly clear that plants can deploy highly specific defensive responses that are differentially perceived by herbivore species, how such responses evolve and are physiologically regulated remains an important gap. Relatively straightforward methodologies are now available to close the loop between plant perception of herbivory, hormonal responses, and production of defensive end-products across genotype or species},
	keywords = {COMMUNITIES, COMMUNITY, community ecology, COMPLEXITY, ecology, EVOLUTION, HERBIVORE, herbivory, interactions, MODEL, phylogeny, plant, plant-herbivore interactions, PLANTS, POPULATIONS, RESPONSES, SPECIFICITY, theory},
	isbn = {0269-8463},
	url = {ISI:000288501100012},
	author = {Agrawal,A.A.}
}
@article {958,
	title = {How specialists can be generalists: resolving the "parasite paradox" and implications for emerging infectious disease},
	journal = {Zoologia},
	volume = {27},
	year = {2010},
	note = {J
APR},
	month = {2010///},
	pages = {151 - 162},
	abstract = {The parasite paradox arises from the dual observations that parasites (broadly construed, including phytophagous insects) are resource specialists with restricted host ranges, and yet shifts onto relatively unrelated hosts are common in the phylogenetic diversification of parasite lineages and directly observable in ecological time. We synthesize the emerging solution to this paradox: phenotypic flexibility and phylogenetic conservatism in traits related to resource use, grouped under the term ecological fitting, provide substantial opportunities for rapid host switching in changing environments, in the absence of the evolution of novel host-utilization capabilities. We discuss mechanisms behind ecological fitting, its implications for defining specialists and generalists, and briefly review empirical examples of host shifts in the context of ecological fitting. We conclude that host shifts via ecological fitting provide the fuel for the expansion phase of the recently proposed oscillation hypothesis of host range and speciation, and, more generally, the generation of novel combinations of interacting species within the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. Finally, we conclude that taxon pulses, driven by climate change and large-scale ecological perturbation are drivers of biotic mixing and resultant ecological fitting, which leads to increased rates of rapid host switching, including the agents of Emerging Infectious Disease},
	keywords = {Climate change, CLIMATE-CHANGE, coevolution, EVOLUTION, HYPOTHESIS, insect, INSECTS, PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECTS, SPECIALISTS, speciation, theory},
	isbn = {1984-4670},
	url = {ISI:000277490100001},
	author = {Agosta,S.J. and Janz,N. and Brooks,D.R.}
}
